| Web | Results 1 - 10 of about 1,060 for /,sa=Go. (0.19 seconds) |
... process with cookie and possible Opaque data verification if successful, send R2, drop old SAs, establish new SA, go to R2-SENT if fail, ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg00994.html - |
In this case, all packets that match any particular SA go through the same member, so no synchronization of the replay counter needs to be done. ... www.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.xml |
Datagram to send requiring a new SA, send I1 and go to I1-SENT Receive I1, send R1 and stay at UNASSOCIATED Receive I2, process if successful, ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg01001.html - |
<**JL**> +------------+ |UNASSOCIATED| Start state +------------+ Datagram to send requiring a new SA, send I1 and go to I1-SENT Receive I1, ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg01019.html - |
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View Your browser may not have a PDF reader available. Google recommends visiting our text version of this document. Sep 15, 2009 ... entry go through a single peer. In this case, all packets that match any particular SA go through the same member, so no synchronization ... tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt |
Oct 9, 2009 ... I do not agree that we should encourage people to go out of their way > to detect a simultaneous IKE SA rekey. I'm fine with allowing an ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg04909.html - |
Receive I2, process with Birthday check if successful, send R2, drop old SAs, establish new SA, go to R2-SENT if fail, stay at ESTABLISHED/REKEYING/RESYNC ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg00539.html - |
However, I thought about the SA established between the MN and the HA. When the BCE is deleted does the SA go away as well? In case of static SAs I guess ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nemo/current/msg06660.html |
However, I thought > about the > SA established between the MN and the HA. When the BCE is > deleted does > the SA go away as well? ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nemo/current/msg06662.html - |
I don't see why we couldn't let IKEv2 have a go at displacing PANA in the > marketplace. ... So what if it creates an IPsec > SA. Just don't use it. ... www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg05447.html - |
| |